The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a general restaurant with the trade name “C”.

When the Defendant was unable to enter a parking lot due to a vehicle parked at the entrance of the parking lot at the residence, the Defendant knew that the operator of the vehicle was a guest who found “E” in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and found the above restaurant on August 22, 2014, and then worked there at the above restaurant, and the victim F (E), who was working at the above restaurant, stated that the customer “I have parked a vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot,” and that the victim went to the front place on the ground that “I have not parked a restaurant vehicle at the entrance of the parking lot, I have moved to the front place.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes stipulated in Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which constitute a crime of non-prosecution pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant after the instant prosecution was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case against the Defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act