logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.06 2018고합100
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강간)
Text

The Defendants, not guilty, publicly notified the summary of the judgment against Defendant A.

Reasons

1. Defendant B, around August 2017, became aware of the Victim F (the age of 29) in the open hosting room around E 30-40 to 30 years of age, and followed the conversation, and the victim was introduced to Defendant A, and became aware of each other.

Defendant

A, around 22:00 on September 10, 2017, at the street corner of "H" located in Gwangju Mine-gu G, a victim who drinks alcoholic beverages at other meetings was allowed to enter a 606 hold room on the same day for more than 23:00 on the same day to drink alcoholic beverages after drinking alcohol at other meetings.

Defendant

A sent the victim to Defendant B by phone, and informed him of the location of the her, and after about 10 minutes, Defendant B came to enter the her motherel with the intention of alcohol and speech.

Defendant

B and the victim divided 1 sick, and Defendant A her talked without drinking alcohol. While Defendant A her talked with drinking, the victim her head at the cleaning place and the bend her bend in order to ensure the drinking, Defendant A her chestd with the victim following the victim, etc., and her chestd with the victim, and her chestd with the victim. As above, Defendant B, who observed Defendant A’s attempt to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim, was able to resist the victim’s body. As such, Defendant B put the victim’s chest into the victim’s body while Defendant B was unable to resist the victim’s body, and Defendant B put the victim’s her sexual organ into the victim’s face.

The Defendants continued to change their position again and inserted their sexual organ into the sound part of the victim at once, and Defendant A repeated them by inserting their sexual organ into the victim’s face and inserting them into the victim’s face.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly committed rape by sexual intercourse with the victim.

2. The Defendants and the defense counsel’s arguments are as follows.

arrow