logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.08.21 2018고정14
국유재산법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall use or benefit from State property without following the procedures and methods prescribed by the State property Act or other Acts.

Nevertheless, in around 1995, the Defendant installed a warehouse of a size of 25 square meters in the land of permanent residence and used it without permission by installing buildings or structures equivalent to a total area of 219 square meters up to now, and around 1996, the Defendant installed a container of a size of 18 square meters in the D land of permanent residence and used it without permission by installing buildings or structures equivalent to a total of 61 square meters up to now, and around 2004, the Defendant created a graveyard of a size of 13 square meters in the land of permanent residence and used it without permission by installing buildings or structures equivalent to a total of 222 square meters in the land of permanent residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement protocol, each investigation report, and actual investigation report with respect to F;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting a crime: Articles 82 and 8 (1) of the Property Act of each of the State-owned property Act (Selection of a punishment);

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. A provisional payment order: In light of the size, period, use, etc. of administrative property that the defendant used without permission for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even if all of the circumstances alleged by the defendant are considered, the amount of fine determined by the summary order of this case is deemed appropriate.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow