All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (each imprisonment of eight months, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendants recognized the commission of a crime and opposed to the Defendants, and the circumstances such as partial abductions were confiscated.

However, in light of the following: (a) there is a need for strict punishment as to the crime of smuggling as seen in the instant case’s case’s violation of the propriety of customs administration; (b) the sentence of sentence is inevitable in light of the Defendants’ frequency of the instant crime and the value of the smuggling brought in; (c) the court below appears to have determined the sentence by fully taking into account various circumstances as the reasons indicated in its judgment; (d) there is no change of circumstances that may vary between the court below and the punishment; and (e) other circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, environment, degree of participation in the crime, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant argument and the record, the court below’s allegation is not acceptable since the sentence imposed on

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.