A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of bodily injury, etc. in the Busan District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 15, 2016.

[2016 Highest 4464]

1. The Defendant, at around 04:10 on September 28, 2016, under the influence of alcohol on the ground that the “E Public Notice Board” management room for the victim D’s operation in Guri-si, Sin-si, does not cut a light, brea the victim’s crypted, and crypt down the victim’s cryp.

(1) The death of a shot year shall be discarded.

Along on about 20 minutes, such as ‘A', the victim expressed his/her will in large interest and failed to wear his/her behavior, and interfered with the victim's duty of operation of the Institute.

2. On October 1, 2016, around 05:40 on October 1, 2016, the Defendant, while walking the door and windows in the management room, was fluoring the above victim with a large amount of about 30 minutes, such as “fluoring fluor, fluoring,” and fluoring the victim’s walk, and obstructed the victim’s duty of operating the Institute of Notification.

[2017 Highest 1504]

3. On January 26, 2017, the Defendant invadedd the structure of the victim by entering the victim’s room against the victim’s will without any justifiable reason, under the influence of alcohol, without paying any charge for the “Hel” 302 of the operation of the victim G, which was located in Gui-si F around 01:40, 2017.

4. When the Defendant, at the time and place described in paragraph 3, requested the victim G to leave the room, the Defendant was aware of the clock year.

The victim’s accommodation operation service was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbances between about 45 minutes, such as her bath and walking the door to the toilet floor by walking the door.

5. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and the Defendant 2:25 on January 26, 2017, 200: (a) stated in paragraph (3) in the telecom.

“The”, upon receipt of 112 report, expressed a desire to take the police officer’s her position in the room to leave the room from the Assistant J of the I District, and expressed one-time face of the police officer’s her face to go from the room and to J himself/herself.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the 112 reporting management work.