logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.05.08 2014가합4877
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running indoor construction business, etc., and the Defendant is a corporation established mainly for the business entrusted under the National Health Promotion Act and the medical examination entrusted by health and medical institutions.

B. 1) The Defendant, the head office, etc. of the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and the main building of the Defendant Daegu-gu branch office on the ground of the 16th ground (hereinafter “instant building”).

(A) Extension (the extension of a building on the sixth floor from underground level to a building on the seventh floor above ground level) and interior interior interior interior interior interior decoration construction, first of all, on April 14, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “original construction”).

2) The part of the remodeling and extension work of the exterior wall of the building of this case (hereinafter “extension work”).

(2) On August 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) concluded a contract agreement on construction works; and (b) concluded a public announcement on the interior remodeling part of the instant building (hereinafter “instant interior construction”); and (c) the Plaintiff participated in the instant interior construction project as the representative of the joint supply and demand organization by forming a joint supply and demand organization with Sung Electric Power, Taeyang Co., Ltd., and the Plaintiff participated in the instant indoor construction project as the representative of the joint supply

On August 21, 2012, the Defendant proceeded with the site site conference in the presence of the Plaintiff, and selected a joint supply and demand organization representing the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) as a successful bidder on August 28, 2012. On August 31, 2012, the Defendant entered into the instant contract for interior construction works with the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract for interior construction works”).

The main contents of the instant indoor construction contract are as follows.

The rate of penalty for delay (including value-added tax): The date of completion on September 1, 2012 on the daily contract amount of 1/1,000 on September 1, 2012: the date of commencement: the general conditions of the construction contract on October 31, 2012;

A. The plaintiff shall commence as prescribed by the contract document, and shall have the contracting officer at the time of commencement.

arrow