Attached Form

It is confirmed that the shareholder's rights for each shares listed in the list are the plaintiff.

The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim is recognized by the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number of the parties if the parties conflict or if the parties conflict with each other; hereinafter the same applies) and theory of change as to the common shares No. 9,350 shares of the Co., Ltd.; 16,500 shares of the Co., Ltd.; and 16,500 shares of the Co., Ltd. to the defendant Co., Ltd...; 206.

The Plaintiff expressed the Defendants’ intent to terminate the trust in the name of shares through the instant complaint, and the facts that the instant complaint was served on Defendant C on May 8, 2020, and each of the Defendant B on May 12, 2020 are clear in the record. As such, the Plaintiff returned to the Plaintiff the right of each shareholder as stated in the attached sheet, and the Defendants, a shareholder’s name, are dissatisfied with this. Therefore, the Plaintiff has a benefit to seek confirmation of the relevant shareholder’s

2. The Defendants’ assertion as to the Defendants’ assertion did not take effect since the Plaintiff promised to pay a certain amount of honorarium in return for the trust held in the name of shares to the Defendants in return of shares, and did not comply therewith.

The argument is asserted.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the existence of the agreement as alleged by the Defendants, and the above assertion by the Defendants is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.