logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.11.18 2019고단2702
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On March 2016, the Defendant: (a) accepted a proposal from B, who was a land manager, to “after establishing a corporation, to open a Saturday and use it for the operation of the soil site, tax reduction, etc.; (b) to grant documents necessary for the establishment of a corporation, 50,000 won per week; (c) established a so-called “Yan corporation” and registered it; and (d) conspired to open an account in the name of the corporation; and (e) make and transfer the passbook, cash card, etc., which is a means of access connected to such account, to another person for use.

1. The Defendant entrusted the foregoing B with all acts necessary for registering the incorporation of a juristic person, such as a seal imprint, seal imprint, resident registration certificate, abstract, and identification card copy, etc., which are necessary for the establishment of a juristic person, according to the above public offering.

B around March 28, 2016, it did not pay the corporation's capital at the Goyang-dong District Court 38-30, 1275-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-si, Mayang-si, the Goyang-si Office of High School, and did not intend to establish and operate the corporation, and prepared an application for the registration of the corporation with respect to the false corporation C, and applied for the registration of the corporation with the inside director as the defendant to the public official in charge of the registration in nameless.

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, entered the computer system in order to complete the registration of incorporation of “C” of “C” in the corporate register, and kept the said computerized corporate register in which the aforementioned false fact was recorded.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with B to make a false report to a public official, thereby having the public official enter false facts in the corporate register, which is the same electronic record as the original of the authentic deed, and having him keep it in the corporate register computer and use it in the same manner as stated in the attached list 1 from around that time to May 9, 2016.

arrow