1. Defendant C Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 72,005,634 as well as 5% per annum from November 19, 2017 to October 30, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The E, F, G land and ground buildings (hereinafter “Defendant building”) are owned by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, and Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) leased this and engaged in wholesale and retail business for households.

B. The Plaintiff is a company that carries on the business of manufacturing equipment and devices for semiconductor manufacturing by leasing a building on the ground located H in Ha in Sungsung-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s building”).

C. On November 19, 2017, around 01:34, in the instant building leased and used by the Defendant Company, fire occurred in the part where the instant building was used as a temporary building by connecting the roof between the warehouse and the warehouse, and subsequently, the instant building was partially destroyed, and the machinery and office equipment inside the Plaintiff’s building located adjacent to the instant factory was destroyed by fire.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). D.

The allocation level of the defendant's building and the plaintiff's building where the fire occurred is as follows, and the fire extinguishing unit investigating the fire accident was concluded as follows in relation to the cause of the fire.

C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C on the ground that CCTV installed at the entrance of the Defendant building was confirmed, and the outer person's intrusion is not discovered, and multiple fire-related factors, such as fire extinguishing points and oil promotion agents, such as fire extinguishing, are all removed and damaged by the digging-out operation at the time of fire extinguishing, and thus cannot be discussed. 2) Electric factors: Electric facilities are installed inside the Defendant building warehouse, and all employees were OF at the time of leaving the warehouse. However, since the CCTV installed at the front of the warehouse, it is presumed that the electric equipment was in transit. However, it is presumed that the electric equipment could not be discussed because inside the warehouse and facilities were removed due to the removal of the inside of the warehouse, etc. at the time of the fire at the time of the fire. 4) Electric factors are determined to have no machinery and equipment inside the Defendant building and thus the possibility of spreading is low).