logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.25 2018노3611
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s penalty of KRW 1,00,000 (fine 1,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 from the original fine and filed an application for formal trial against it.

The court below held that the defendant recognized the crime of this case as an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant, and judged that there was no personal benefit or unnecessary economic burden on its members, and that there was no risk of recidivism by resignation of the president of the association, etc., the court below imposed a penalty against the defendant by significantly reducing the fine for the summary order.

The reasons for sentencing of the lower court are appropriate, and there is no change in sentencing conditions that may be specially considered in the trial compared with the lower court.

In addition, when comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, criminal records, motive and background leading to the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.

arrow