logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.08.07 2015고정210
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a car in k5 vehicle volume.

At around 13:30 on September 6, 2014, the Defendant continued the roads of Hanwon-si D at a speed of about 5 km from the gold village market to the gold village basin.

At the same time, there were many people on the street, so the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to do so and did not see the Victim F (F, 29 years old, female, and female) who had been driving on the road due to negligence, and did not see the victim F (M, 29 years old, female, and the left side part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the victim suffered an injury to the slives of the slives requiring treatment for about two weeks, and immediately stopped, and escaped from the site without necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's oral statement (the part concerning the examination of the defendant);

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each copy of medical examination and treatment, each written confirmation of hospitalization and the defendant's defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that the defendant driven a vehicle by the defendant, or that even if the vehicle and the victim are in contact, it does not compromise the degree of injury.

According to the evidence duly adopted by this court, the witness F testified that he had consistently faced with the vehicle and bridge driven by the defendant from the investigative agency to this court, and the F was under medical treatment on September 6, 2014, the day of the accident, and was under hospital treatment from around September 15, 2014, and the Defendant was under hospital treatment from around September 15, 2014, and the Defendant was found to have left the site as it is even if the victim was in the presence of himself, and accordingly, measures under the corresponding provisions of the Road Traffic Act, such as relief of the victim, are taken.

arrow