logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.18 2017가단213931
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On January 26, 2017, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) on the grounds that the Defendant had received an unfair charge from a passenger who runs a private taxi transport business (hereinafter “instant disposition of fines for negligence”); (b) on the grounds that the Plaintiff had not received unfair demand from the passenger; and (c) accordingly, the Plaintiff sought revocation of the instant disposition of fines for negligence.

2. Determination:

A. According to Article 16(1)2 and Article 23(2) of the Act on the Development of Taxi Transportation Business (hereinafter “taxing Development Act”), Article 16(1)2 and Article 23(2) of the same Act provides that a taxi driver shall impose an administrative fine on his/her taxi driver when collecting unfair fees from passengers, and the above violation of the Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order

Articles 20(1) and (2), 21(1), 25, 36(1), and 38(1) of the Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order may file an objection in writing with the relevant administrative agency within 60 days from the date on which the administrative agency is notified of the imposition of the administrative fine. In the event of an objection, the imposition of the administrative fine shall lose its effect, and in the case of an objection, the administrative agency in receipt of the objection shall notify the competent court along with its opinion and documentary evidence within 14 days from the date on which the objection is filed, and the court in receipt of the notification shall decide the administrative fine by decision stating the reasons therefor, and the parties and the public prosecutor shall file an immediate appeal against

In addition, Article 5 of the Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order provides that "any violation of the provisions of this Act shall be governed by the provisions of other Acts concerning the procedures for the imposition, collection, trial, and enforcement of fines for negligence."

In full view of the above provisions, a party dissatisfied with the imposition of a fine for negligence shall raise an objection to the relevant administrative agency within 60 days from the date of receipt of the notice.

arrow