logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2014.05.14 2014고정24
건축법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “DMoel” in Gangnam-si, and operates a “Fel” in Gangnam-si E.

A person who intends to construct a building with a total floor area of less than 200 square meters in a natural environment conservation area shall file a report thereon with the head of the relevant Si/Do in advance

1. Installation of a database Mongolia;

A. On July 10, 2013, the Defendant constructed Mongolian (5m x 5m m) 6 dong (150m m2) without reporting to the head of Dong in order to provide it to the place of burburine’s burbine next to the above “Dur” to the front public domain.

B. On July 11, 2013, the Defendant constructed Mongolian (5m x 5m m) 6 Dong (150m m2) without reporting to the head of Dong in order to provide the same place as the above paragraph (a) to the head of Dong as a burburcium.

C. The Defendant, at around August 7, 2013, was forced to remove the above A and the above 12 Mongolian (5m x 5m m). Around August 7, 2013, the Defendant constructed the Mongolian (5m x 300m m m ) with 12 Dong (300m m m m m ) without reporting to

2. On July 26, 2013, the Defendant installing the Fel Mongolia installed 8 Dong (5m x 5m m) in Mongolian (200m m2) without filing a report with the head of Dong in order to provide the Furher’s next site located adjacent to Gangseo-si E to a burcule.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some of the suspect interrogation records prepared by the police;

1. Voluntary statements, voluntary statements, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photo ledger;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 111 of the Building Act and Article 14 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which appears to be due to the mistake that it was permissible in the process of the relevant administrative appeal and criminal trial, shall be determined as ordered in light of the overall circumstances.

It is so ordered as per Disposition for the reasons above.

arrow