1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 1, 1978, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served as Second Lieutenant on September 5, 1980, and was discharged from military service on July 26, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “urine accompanied by a merger certificate,” and on September 10, 2006, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on September 31, 201, with each of the diagnosis as “an acute brain fluencing accompanied by a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluorals

B. On May 14, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “cathos, saturine, saturine, and cerebral hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal, and satal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”). However, upon deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed it on July 9, 2013.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 7, the purport of whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion has been receiving harsh training in the military forces for 26 years before the outbreak of each of the instant wound since the officer, and worked as a responsible officer in many units, and the Plaintiff was in the military forces in a healthy state, and there was no family history or evidence of the instant wound. In light of the above, there is a proximate causal relation between the outbreak or aggravation of each of the instant wound and the Plaintiff’s performance of official duties.

The instant disposition based on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.

다. 인정사실 ⑴ 군복무 내용 등 ㈎ 원고는 1978. 8. 1. 육군에 입대하여 1980. 9. 5....