logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.20 2016가단5250109
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership among the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s real estate indicated in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As to the registration of preservation of ownership of the instant real estate and the registration of each disposition of arrears on each of the instant real estate in arrears, paragraph (2) of the Disposition No. 2 in the name of Defendant E on December 7, 2010 upon the application by subrogation of the Defendant Republic of Korea (competent jurisdiction):

(3) The registration of preservation of ownership as indicated in the record is completed; ② The registration of the attachment of the Defendant Republic of Korea (Jurisdiction: Namyang Tax Office); the registration of the attachment of the same registry office on April 23, 2013; the registration of the attachment of the Defendant Republic of Korea (Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction) on the same registry office on April 23, 2013; and the registration of the attachment of the same registry office on June 10, 2015; and the registration of the attachment of the same registry office on the same registry office on December 25624, 200.

B. As to the instant real estate subject to the transfer registration of ownership regarding the instant real estate, Paragraph 2 of the Disposition, which was based on public sale on July 4, 2016, on August 18, 2016.

(2) On September 1, 2016, the registration of transfer of ownership was completed, and later, it is stipulated in Paragraph (2) of the Disposition based on the sale on August 31, 2016.

(1) The registration of ownership transfer was completed.

C. On August 20, 2001, the Plaintiff, as well as Defendant E, intended to purchase the F.W. F. 262m2m2, G. 221m2, H. 1,798m2, before I, 1,778m2, before J. 1,940m2, and K. 66m2 from Defendant E to purchase KRW 4,50,000,000 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. The above sales amount was paid by September 4, 2001 to Defendant E.

Paragraph 1 of the Sale Farmland

1. Each of the above documents is written as “the answer,” but it is “the front” according to Gap evidence 1-2.

1,940 square meters

2. Paragraph 2 of Article 66 square meters in K:

1. Pyeong-gun H 1,798 square meters;

2. 1,78 square meters prior to I;

3. G field 221 square meters;

4. Article 1 of F 262 square meters;

1. The seller E shall sell to the buyer A six above parcels of land in gold Hun-Hun million Won (Won 450,000,000).

Article 2

1. E shall change the location of the house and warehouse of the JJ approved under the existing paragraph 1.

arrow