logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.12.14 2017고단1187
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 1, 2017, at around 23:20 on August 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took a bath in the “D Lestop” operated by the victim C in Gumi-si B; (b) took a bath to request the employee to go out; and (c) took two main diseases that were later than the display stand and the display stand, and damaged the two main show stand to be 60,000 won in the market price.

2. On August 1, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties: (a) the victim’s 112 report at the place specified in paragraph (1) around August 23:27, 2017; and (b) the police officer asked other customers to return home at the place of business, and the other customers are present at the seat of the seat, and (c) the Defendant is going to close down with a large voice.

It shall be discarded in incidental terms at the time of mershion.

C. Sweak, Swelver, do not impose tax on the taxable person.

The victim interfered with the victim's Lestop business by force for about twenty (20) minutes, such as putting the victim's desire to see "".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Investigation report (as to attachment of Lestop condition and site photograph at the time of arrest)

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (the fact of releasing a suspect A from repeated crime and previous convictions of the same kind);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include many criminal records of violence, and in particular, on December 2, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment by the Seoul Northern District Court due to special robbery, etc. on December 2, 2011, and recommitting a repeated crime during the period of repeated offense after the execution of the sentence was completed in a permanent prison on February 18, 2017, and agreed with the victim.

arrow