The appeal is dismissed.

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance is rendered on April 30, 2013.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case for the reasons stated in its reasoning, and there is no violation of the rules of evidence as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, there is an error of infringing on the essential contents of the principle of balanced criminal punishment and the principle of responsibility in examining and determining the sentencing of the court below.

The argument to the effect that punishment or punishment is too unreasonable is ultimately an argument of unreasonable sentencing.

However, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

In addition, the remaining grounds of appeal are not legitimate grounds of appeal under Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, on the ground that there is an obvious clerical error in the indication of the first instance judgment.