beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On May 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on May 29, 2018, and (b) at Cju points, the Defendant, who had a dispute with the victim D (the South and the age of 52) and the drinking place at Cju points, took several times on the part of the victim’s face; (b) the victim’s face side was spucked on several occasions on several occasions on several occasions on the part of his hand; and (c) the Defendant got away from the victim’s face in the above restaurant, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as blood transfusion, which requires treatment for about 14 days, by driving away from the victim’s face.
2. Determination
A. It is true that there is a doubt that the defendant does not inflict an injury on the victim, such as the facts charged, in full view of the fact that the victim claimed that he/she was the same as the facts charged, and the victim was written in the death diagnosis report that he/she suffered an injury.
B. However, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances admitted by evidence, it is insufficient to deem that the facts charged are proven beyond reasonable doubt-how solely with the circumstances mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (a) and other evidence submitted by the prosecutor.
1) The main witness E, the only witness of which is the most objective witness, and the main witness, state that the defendant was unable to see that he did not assault the victim as shown in the facts charged. A) / The most of the offenses committed within the main points appears to have been witness (the victim also stated in this court that he continued to be the victim at the time of the instant case. The victim stated in this court that he was the victim’s witness record record, 5-6 pages), and the defendant did not see that he was the victim, and that there was a fact that there was a little little speech between the defendant and the victim at the time, but was not an atmosphere of assault.
(12 pages, etc. of the witness E) In addition, as described in the facts charged, the defendant discriminates against the victim within the main point.