logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2017가단5144492
대여금
Text

1. As to KRW 50,00,000 and KRW 12,500,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 50,000 from September 22, 2016, and KRW 12,50,000.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the cause of the claim in Gap evidence No. 1, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay 27.8% per annum to the Defendant on August 19, 2016; 12.5 million won per annum to the Defendant on September 21, 2016; and 2.5 million won per annum to the Plaintiff on September 21, 2016; 2.5 million won per annum from the date following the date of repayment to the date of repayment; and 3.5 million won from the date following the date of repayment to the date of repayment; and 2.5 million won from the date of repayment to the date of November 21, 2016 to the date of repayment; and 2.5 million won from the date following the date of repayment to the date of repayment to the date of repayment to the Plaintiff; and 2.5 million won from the date following the date of repayment to the date of repayment to the date of 2.1 million won from the date of repayment to the date of repayment to 2.2.

2. As to the Defendant’s assertion of repayment, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff paid the principal and interest of the loan to the Plaintiff by transferring KRW 52,500,000 to the D Bank account of the limited liability company C, which is the Plaintiff’s subsidiary, but the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 are insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s assertion, and there is no other evidence to

The defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow