logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.12 2016나58668
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. Plaintiffs’ appeal, incidental appeal by Defendant E, F, and Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd., and Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. As the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, all appeals filed by the plaintiffs and incidental appeals filed by the defendant E, F, and Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. are dismissed as it is without merit. The provisional appeal filed by the defendant Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. on the premise of the revocation of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as it

arrow