logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단2031
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) along with B on March 23, 2014, while drinking alcohol at “Djuk” located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, around 12:10 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant became the victim E (the age of 25) who was seated by the mother of the Defendant on the next table.

When the above victim's face is fit to be taken as a drinking, the defendant sent the victim's cocon once a drinking, and B took the victim's face one time by drinking as a drinking, and B took the victim's neck by drinking it.

As a result, the defendant, in collaboration with the victim B, suffered injury to the victim, such as non-closed pelke, which requires about six weeks of treatment.

2. When the Defendant arrested the police officer as an offender in the act of committing an offense in the crime under the above paragraph (1), he thought that he had the intent to exercise as if he had known that he had been F, in order to conceal the fact of fine collection.

At around 12:40 on March 23, 2014, the Defendant entered “F” in the confirmation letter of arrest of flagrant offenders and physical restraint suspect's body body in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoyang-gu Office, with the black-gu clock, and marked the suspect's personal seal next to it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a private document in F’s name concerning a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph (2), issued to G police officers who knew of the forgery a false flagrant offender arrest certificate and a physical custody certificate of a physically detained suspect, and exercised the same as if they were duly formed.

4. The Defendant, who was arrested on the same grounds as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (2), had the Defendant thought that he had the intention to exercise his friendship as if he were F in the interrogation of the suspect by a judicial police officer.

The defendant around 14:57 on March 23, 2014 at the jurisdiction of the Gwangjin Police Station and the office located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul.

arrow