The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In the open space within the main point of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors and misapprehension of the legal principles), customers were only engaged in training the victims from time to time who were unable to work properly during the hours when they were frequently. As such, the part of the victim’s fear was not considered an indecent act in the crime of indecent act by compulsion, and there was no intention to commit indecent act in the crime of indecent act by compulsion.

2. The judgment of the court below and the court below alleged that the defendant was unable to properly perform an act as stated in the crime in the judgment at the level of educating the victim, i.e., the defendant alleged that he was unable to contain the bbbbbb and display the brea at the display stand, while explaining that the defendant committed an act as stated in the judgment at the level of educating the victim. It cannot be accepted that the victim's breath part was related to the education of the victim's breath and display the breath on the breath part of the victim's breath part, and the defendant stated that "the breath part was caused by the victim's breath or inside the breath part" after the victim's breath part was delivered only once with the victim's breath part of the breath part of the breath part, and that the male's breath or flath without the consent of other women's breath can sufficiently be recognized as an indecent act against sexual morality.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.