logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.05.11 2018고정228
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) from the Daejeon District Court's branch on December 18, 2009. On August 10, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) from the Daejeon District Court's Branch Branch on August 10, 201.

On October 27, 2017, at around 21:40, the Defendant driven BM5 car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.057% from the 200 meters section to the roads in front of the restaurant of the kimchi Gichi Gichi Gichi, SM5 car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving and inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to file a separate summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the order of provisional payment is that the Defendant had a history of being subject to criminal punishment twice due to drinking, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

At the time of crackdown, the Defendant escaped while leaving the vehicle at the time of crackdown.

However, the defendant is against his or her will to recognize his or her mistake.

There is no history of criminal punishment after 2012.

In addition to these circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various circumstances shown in the argument of this case.

arrow