1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 28, 2014, at around 11:10, the Plaintiff operated a luminous bridge P41 point in B Liberababs, located in the Young-gu, Busan (hereinafter “Ambabsn vehicle”) and proceeded into two lanes between the four-lanes on the surface of the sea area, which was changed to the three-lanes, and did not find out the victim C driver’s D Ebs vehicle (hereinafter “victim’s vehicle”) going into the latter part of the Ambsnbs vehicle, while changing to the three-lanes, the Plaintiff left the accident site after he/she received the front part of the damaged vehicle for about two weeks, received about two weeks of treatment from the victim C (hereinafter “the accident site”).

B. On May 9, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of a decision to revoke the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of June 4, 2014 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff, while driving a sea-going vehicle, caused a traffic accident with one ordinary person, and escaped without fulfilling on-site relief measures or duty to report.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Eul evidence 1-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff: (a) the luminous bridge, the point where the accident occurred, is a place where the vehicle is shaken by the vehicle speed and the strong wind due to drilling; (b) while carrying food materials on the melting vehicle at the time of the accident, the vehicle was seriously shakened, but the strong wind was serious; (c) later, the back of the melting vehicle stopped on the road in order to check the metal scrap which is towing on the road, and it was thought that the latter part of the melting vehicle stopped on the road, and did not fully recognize the fact that the damaged vehicle was shocked, and that the damaged vehicle was damaged by the victim. Therefore, the plaintiff's duty to take relief measures.