1. Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, the points in the separate sheet No. 3, 6, 7, 8, and 3 are successively connected.

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 2-1 of evidence Nos. 1-2, and the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the appraiser F’s survey and appraisal results, and the overall purport of arguments, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet is as follows: (a) the net G (hereinafter “the network”) shares 2268/7210; (b) the defendant C shares 2590/7210; (c) the 1001/7210 shares; and (d) the defendant E shares 1351/7210 shares in each of the above lands; (b) the deceased and the Defendants owned their own houses and buildings on each of the above lands; and (c) in fact, the deceased and the Defendants possessed each of the above portions on each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, with regard to each of the above portions indicated in the separate sheet No. 3,6,78, and 300 square meters and each of the annexed sheet No. 24.

Therefore, with respect to the instant land, Defendant C’s respective shares of 2590/1420, on July 8, 2011, the day on which the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination of title trust was served, and Defendant D’s respective shares of 1001/1420, on the ground of termination of title trust on January 222, 2013, and Defendant E’s respective shares of 1351/1420, respectively.