logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.03 2016가단25270
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On July 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff manufactured and supplied a main household at the construction site of B-ground multi-household housing ordered by the Defendant, but did not receive KRW 34,94,00, out of the price of the goods for the said main household, and thus, the Plaintiff sought payment for the said goods and damages for delay against the Defendant.

2. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of the main household with the Defendant solely on the basis of the descriptions of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, and Eul evidence No. 2.

It is insufficient to recognize that the defendant agreed to pay the price of delivered goods to the plaintiff or to pay the price of delivered goods to the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit without examining the remainder of the issue.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow