The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant, while making a statement to the F’s violation of the F’s Copyright Act and pursuing the source of pictures, did not contain a statement that defames the victim’s reputation, the lower court convicted the Defendant by misunderstanding the fact and thereby pronounced the Defendant guilty.

2. The lower court acknowledged the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, the Defendant and the victim promised to open the exhibition of the photograph taken by the Defendant at the luminous government office from March 22, 2011 to March 31, 2011. At the time of the instant case, exhibitions continued to exist until the time, and the Defendant believed that the presentation was delayed until the time of the instant case, and that the injured party had a bad appraisal of the Defendant’s photograph. Prior to the instant case, the Defendant demanded F to request F to prepare a confirmation letter stating that “the injured party would take the Defendant’s work back and sell it,” but F would not have any such fact, but F would have refused the Defendant’s request to make a false confirmation statement, and F would have been replaced by FF’s signature and photograph, and the victim would have to have been removed from the victim’s signature to cooperate with FF. The victim would have to be removed.

In full view of the fact that the Defendant voluntarily stated that the victim was removed from the Defendant’s money amounting to KRW 30 million, and that the Defendant stated that the Defendant was the victim’s fraud, it is recognized that the Defendant stated the facts charged in D to F.