A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s nursing services by force by failing to properly provide nursing services to the nurses for about 20 minutes, including, but not limited to, the victim, etc.; (b) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant 22:2, around Daejeon Sung-gu B; and (c) at the C convalescent hospital, the Defendant took a bath to the victim D of nursing care; and (c) talked with sound on the floor of the hospital office.

2. The Defendant is going to kill the victim D of nursing in the time, place, and the police officers dispatched to the hospital E with the hospital’s security guards at the time, place, and the time, place specified in paragraph 1.

Women's I am special?

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

3. On March 14, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and around March 22:37, 2017, hereinafter in the above C’s convalescent hospital, she puts a failure to go with.

“A police officer belonging to the F District of the U.S. Police Station who was called up upon receipt of a report 112, expressed his/her desire to return home, and assaulted him/her with his/her face twice on the floor of his/her hand, and walking his/her mouths twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of each statement and Acts and subordinate statutes governing the written complaint;

1. Articles 314(1), 311, and 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the criminal defendant reflects his/her wrong and that he/she agreed with G with the police officer);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;