1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 81,087,213, respectively, and KRW 32,937,438 among Defendant F, Defendant G, and Defendant H, as to April 7, 2016.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff concluded a credit guarantee contract with the deceased J on seven occasions ( ① 3,00,000 won on October 6, 200, ② 1,800,000 won on October 6, 200, ③ 14,380,000 won on June 4, 2001, ④ 25,400,500 won on June 7, 2001, ⑤ 10,000,000 won on November 26, 2001, ⑤ 20,000,60,000 won on November 26, 2001, and ⑥ 20,000,000 won on credit guarantee under each credit guarantee contract with each of the above 20,000 won on November 10, 201, 7,600, 200, and 38,00 net on credit guarantee, respectively.

3) As of April 6, 2016, the deceased J’s obligation under each of the above credit guarantee agreements occurred with the principal amounting to KRW 98,812,315; KRW 143,748,873; KRW 143,209; KRW 109,105; KRW 272,137; KRW 243,261,639; KRW 69; KRW 69,038,733; KRW 98,923,40; KRW 319,180; KRW 72,876; KRW 272; KRW 162,630; KRW 162,301; KRW 278; KRW 278,626,309; and KRW 201,000; KRW 275,000; and the heir’s share in inheritance after April 6, 2016.

5) The report was accepted on May 2, 2005 by the deceased I, the defendant C, the defendant D, the defendant E, the K, the defendant A, and the defendant B filed a report to waive the inheritance of the deceased deceased's property with the Gwangju District Court Decision 2005Ra126, and the above report was accepted on May 2, 2005. The defendant C, the defendant D, and the defendant E filed a qualified acceptance report on the inheritance of the deceased deceased's deceased's property by the Gwangju Family Court Branch Decision 2016Ra386, Sept. 8, 2016. The above report was accepted on September 6, 2016. The defendant F, the defendant G's children, and the defendant H are the children of the defendant Eul.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleading is as follows.