1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff containers listed in the attached Table, which are installed on the land of Pyeongtaek-si Cro 643 square meters.

2...

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), the plaintiff allowed two containers listed in Paragraph (1) of the disposition of the plaintiff (hereinafter "container of this case") to be used free of charge on the premise that the plaintiff's father D and the defendant's teaching system were suspended. When the above D and the defendant's teaching system were suspended, the plaintiff can be acknowledged as the delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case, and the termination of the loan agreement with the defendant for use.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant container to the Plaintiff.

As to this, the defendant argued to the effect that the use of the container of this case is legitimate because he had a finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite, but it is difficult to recognize the defendant's above assertion only with the statement of No. 7. (In addition, the above finite finite finite finite fin