logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.06.24 2013고정238
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The victim D is the chairperson of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Promotion Committee for the Establishment of Housing Redevelopment Project Cooperatives in the J district, which was approved by the Goyang-si on March 30, 201, and the defendant is the vice chairperson of the promotion committee.

1. On March 29, 2012, the Defendant sent to approximately 1,600 persons, such as T owners of land in the said service area, at the Goyang-gu Goyang-dong post office located in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 2012, an appeal containing the following contents in relation to the selection of the management entity specialized in the improvement of the said business:

- The Chairman shall consult with the G Representative and several persons who are not members of the Committee.

- The D Chairman is a sole business without going through a meeting of officers and is exchanging and reflecting opinions only by the company.

In other areas, it has been a set of business contents that set the estimated construction cost of KRW 3.7 million to KRW 3.8 million at a higher level than KRW 4.2 million.

- On August 12, 2011, G was selected by presenting it to the residents' general meeting without asking about the decline or decline, disregarding the matters decided by the board of directors.

- After the end of the executive conference on August 12, 2011, the board of directors did not hold a meeting itself, and rejected the consultation on work with the officers.

However, in fact, at the meeting of the executives held on August 12, 201 in relation to the selection of the management entity specialized in the redevelopment project, the committee composed of the chairperson, vice-chairperson, auditor, etc. of the above promotion committee has decided to prepare a comparison table and present it to the second promotion committee. However, at the meeting of the executives held on August 18, 201, the committee decided to present the agenda to the promotion committee only for the existence of the qualifications of the H and I two companies involved in illegal publicity, etc., and accordingly, to deprive the said two companies of the qualifications for bidding at the second promotion committee of the J District held on August 29, 201, the J District third party of the J District held on September 8, 2011.

arrow