logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.06.07 2017고단2278
사기등
Text

No. 1-2 of the judgment of the defendant is the first-year and 10 months, and the second-year and 1-2 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months as a crime of violating road traffic law at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on March 30, 2016, and the judgment on April 7, 2016 became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

A. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant against the victim E, at the G office of the Defendant’s work located in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, to the victim E, the representative of the said G business partner of the said G, “If the cost of materials is insufficient to obtain an order from the said G business partner Korea, he/she will sell goods to the G business partnership canal Korea and make a payment with the interest of KRW 80,000,000,000,000 as the price of the goods within three days.

By making a false statement, G showed that it was falsely made to the victim as if it received an order from the canalus Korea to place the goods.

However, as in the above order order, G did not have received an order from the LAW Co., Ltd., and the defendant did not have any particular property or income, and there was about KRW 60 million corporate bonds, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan from the injured party even if he borrowed money from the injured party for his personal debt repayment and living expenses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 2,200,000 won from the bank account (I) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

B. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant against the victim D, who was known to the office of the above G office, was awarded an order from the victim D to the G office of this G office, and if the material cost is insufficient to lend the money to the G LAB Co., Ltd., the Defendant would sell the goods to the KAB cans Korea and pay the interest to the company as much as the price is paid for the goods.

“A false statement shall be made to the victim as if G had received orders from the canals Korea in order for the goods to be sold by G in a false manner.”

arrow