logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.12.16 2016고단860
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant reported to the marriage with C on March 2, 2016, the victim D is a person of C, and the victim E is a woman of C.

1. On March 2014, the Defendant against the victim D calls to the victim D, saying, “The investors have prepared for a new construction project of F building. An investor has been prepared for a definite project, and the cost of documents and expenses are urgently needed. The Defendant borrowed money to believe that he/she has a reliable credit. If he/she borrowed KRW 50 million, he/she will use it as a gold and complete payment.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income at that time, and there was no specific progress of the F Building Construction Project to the extent that the investor became final and conclusive, and the husband of the Defendant was also in bad credit standing, and the Defendant was thought to repay obligations to other debtors with borrowed money from the victim, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the same according to the promise even if he borrowed money from the victim.

On March 16, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 30 million won from the bank account in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant from the victim as the borrowed money.

2. Around May 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the Defendant’s home located in Seogu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, stating, “Around now, there is any delay in raising money at a domestic bank, and is currently being delayed. Masp loan 100 million won is extended to a high mother and will be restored to its original state. Masp loan 100 million won, and will be restored to its original state. I do not know about what will not be damaged.”

However, the defendant did not have any particular income at that time, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt to other debtors with the money borrowed from the victim or to pay the card price, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay it as agreed.

The Defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow