logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.02.21 2016재다50335
강제집행에 관한 소송
Text

All requests for retrial are dismissed.

The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds for request for retrial shall be examined.

Article 451(1)4 and 9 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that a ground for retrial exists in the judgment subject to a retrial. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that a judge, who was involved in a judgment subject to a retrial, committed a crime relating to duties, such as abandonment of duties or abuse of authority, with respect to such case, and ② insofar as a judge’s assertion on grounds of appeal on grounds of appeal falls under a ground for a retrial under a ground for a retrial under Article 451(1)4 and 9 of the Civil Procedure Act and dismissed an appeal without further deliberation, the judgment on grounds of appeal cannot be deemed omitted (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Da502, Feb. 12, 2009). As such, there is no ground for retrial under Article 4

Therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed, and the costs of retrial are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow