The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s appellate brief (unfair sentencing) recognized the error of the Defendant; and (b) support the natural parents and two children after the divorce with the victim; (c) the sentence of the lower court that sentenced the community service order for two and eight (80) years of suspended execution in October is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant, while making a dispute with the victim, who is his spouse at his residence, brought the victim a knife and threaten the victim with the knife, which is an article dangerous in the main room.

The reason behind appeal is that the court below is already reflected in the sentencing and there is no special change of circumstances that can be considered in the court below's age, sexual behavior, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, it is not determined that the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, considering all the conditions of the sentencing of the case, such as the records and arguments of this case, such as the following: the fact that the television, etc. in a ward continuously was damaged by drinking, the fact that it is not good that the defendant was injured by drinking the victim in the past; the fact that the defendant inflicted a bodily injury on the part of the injured party, but did not compensate for the damage; the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are already reflected in the sentencing; and there is no other special circumstance that the court below is considered in the trial after the crime.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.