The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal by the defendant are too heavy for the court below's punishment.

(In particular, the Defendant is seeking exemption from community service order due to the issue of livelihood). Although the Defendant has led to the time of the trial, it is difficult to regard it as an essential factor for sentencing in light of the developments leading up to the crime of special injury, the content of each of the instant crimes, etc.

In addition, it is difficult to exempt community service order in light of the content of each crime of this case, degree of damage, circumstances after the crime, defendant's same criminal records, etc.

In addition, even if the court below's reasons for sentencing together with all the circumstances and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

[However, Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Article 366 of the Criminal Act) shall be construed as "Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Article 366 of the Act on the Destruction and Damage of Property, Selection of Imprisonment)" for the applicable criminal facts in the context of the judgment of the court below, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act shall be revised ex officio to add "(within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments of the two crimes)" at the end of