logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.20 2015나3409
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The judgment of the plaintiff as to the cause of the claim that "B shall pay 20 million won to the plaintiff as the preserved bond and 20 million won the amount of wages, retirement allowances, etc. which Eul had against the defendant as the Busan District Court Decision 2009Kadan2208, and the provisional attachment order was issued by the above court on February 26, 2009. The above decision was delivered to the defendant on March 3, 2009. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B as the Busan District Court Branch Branch 2009Gadan2816, and it was confirmed that "B shall pay 20,000,000 won to the defendant and 200 won as the amount of money calculated by the rate of 20% per annum from March 26, 2009 to the date of complete payment, and that the above decision shall be accepted as the judgment of the court on March 18, 209 and the court on February 29, 2019 as the retirement allowance claim of the defendant 201.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay one half of the retirement allowances to be paid to the plaintiff who is the collection obligee B as the collection obligee B, except in extenuating circumstances.

2. On the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant asserted that since the retirement allowance against B was already paid prior to the delivery of the above provisional seizure order, the plaintiff's claim cannot be complied with.

According to the fact-finding results of the first instance court and Busan Bank, B retired on January 1, 2009, and the defendant further retired from office.

arrow