1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Whether the lawsuit of this case is legitimate

A. Articles 286(1) and 292(1) and (2) of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act provide that where a rehabilitation plan is rejected, the court shall decide to discontinue the rehabilitation procedures ex officio. When the decision to discontinue the rehabilitation procedures is confirmed and the debtor fails to raise an objection, the court shall enter the matters concerning the rehabilitation claim, etc. in the list of rehabilitation creditors, etc. in the final and conclusive judgment on the debtor, and the rehabilitation creditors, etc. may enforce compulsory execution on the debtor according to the list of rehabilitation creditors, etc. except where the debtor is declared bankrupt pursuant to Article 6 of the

B. In light of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the Defendant filed an application for corporate rehabilitation procedures with the Suwon District Court 2016 Gohap5 (hereinafter “instant rehabilitation procedures”), and filed each claim of Plaintiffs A17,185,435, Plaintiff B8,897,803, Plaintiff C7,015,874, which the Plaintiffs sought in the instant case, and reported each claim to be entered in the list of rehabilitation creditors, and the fact that the said rehabilitation procedures were abolished on June 22, 2018 can be acknowledged.

C. Therefore, since each claim sought by the plaintiffs in this case can immediately proceed to compulsory execution against the defendant in the same manner as the final and conclusive judgment is based on the table of rehabilitation of the rehabilitation procedure of this case, there is no benefit of lawsuit seeking the payment separately.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' lawsuit of this case is entirely dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.