The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant paid 1,578,90 won out of 2,413,100 won to the victims of the instant case at the lower court, on the top of 2014 High Order 2099.

The 2014 High Court paid 981,650 won out of the amount of damage 3,151,450 won to the victims of the 3471 High Court and paid 707,470 won additionally to the appellate court.

The 2014 Highest 3685 victims paid KRW 16,700 to the appellate court, and paid KRW 37,500 out of KRW 46,100 to the victims of the 4029 Highest 4029 Highest 2014 and paid KRW 8,600 to the appellate court.

The 2015 Highest 108 victims paid 2,373,800 won in the appellate court. The 2015 Highest 229 victims agreed with the lower court and the 229 Highest 2015 Highest 2015 Highest 2015 Highest 201, and the

2015 Highest 3351 victims of the instant case paid 1,41,00 won in full at the lower court.

In addition, in order to compensate and reflect on the total amount of the remaining damages that the defendant failed to pay due to the lack of contact, address, etc., 2,300,000 won was donated to the Young Military mission of the Young Military in relation to the protection of the homeless and the projects for self-reliance and self-support of the homeless.

However, even though the Defendant was punished for a similar crime of fraud, the Defendant committed the instant fraud repeatedly during the period of the suspension of execution.

In addition, after release by release on bail while being tried for detention as part of the crime of fraud of this case, the fraud of the same law has been continuously committed.

In addition, considering the facts alleged by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable, even if considering all the circumstances alleged by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. Conclusion.