logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2017.11.23 2017가합10061
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant F Co., Ltd. is composed of KRW 733,52,145, and KRW 4,000,000 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 800,000 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence, evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 15, 18, 19, 27, 29 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply);

(ii)each entry in Eul-B or 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings

A. Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) awarded a new construction contract from the KG to the KG to the KG in charge of the instant project, and Defendant F awarded a subcontract to Defendant FF to the KG in charge of the instant project, and Defendant F awarded a re-subcontract to the KG in charge of the installation works of the off-board panel (hereinafter “instant project”) during the said project.

B. On June 5, 2014, Plaintiff A, as an employee of the Nonparty Company, installed a board on the outer wall of the building 11 meters above the ground at the construction site of the instant construction site, and installed it using a safety log, suffered bodily injury, such as double covering of a safety bell fixed on the rooftop structure, falling on the ground, and falling on the ground, and then falling on the top, and smoding pressure 12.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Korea Labor Welfare Corporation paid the Plaintiff A KRW 94,513,370 as temporary layoff benefits due to the instant accident, and KRW 179,273,270 as medical care benefits.

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of the Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff C and D are the children of the Plaintiff.

E. The provisions pertaining to the instant case are listed in the annexed sheet.

2. Claim against Defendant F;

A. If the testimony of the above macroscopic evidence and witness K’s testimony show the overall purport of the pleading, this case’s Corporation supplied the necessary materials to the non-party company, and the non-party company supplied the above materials to the non-party company, and 6-7 employees of the non-party company, including the plaintiff, etc. working at the construction site of this case. The defendant F posted one employee belonging to the construction site of this case to take charge of material management, work instruction, process management, personnel management, etc. of the non-party company, according to the above facts of recognition.

arrow