beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 23, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim B, on the Internet CKaf page, posted a letter requesting the repair of the victim B to the victim, and made a false statement to the effect that “When repair cost is paid due to the internal operation of the sealing supply site, it will be repaired.”
However, at that time, the Defendant was unable to properly operate the salary provision site because of the failure to pay the building deposit or the failure to properly operate the salary provision site. In addition to the Defendant’s liability of KRW 571,00, KRW 2,480,000 to D, KRW 2,65,00, and KRW 1,656,000 to F (State), the Defendant was urged to lend money from the bond business operator, and even if there was no particular property, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete the repair requested by the victim due to normal operation of the salary provision site.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 514,00 from the victim as repair expenses around May 23, 2018, and KRW 285,800 from May 24, 2018 to the G association account in the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of 799,800 won by deceiving the victim.
2. On April 2018, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim H made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would first send the raw and secondary materials, and deposit KRW 1,650,000,000,00,000 from May 23, 2018, to manufacture and send the goods to the victim upon receiving a request from the Victim H to manufacture the cryp cryp and rain crys for young children at the top of the police station.”
However, at that time, the Defendant was unable to properly operate the salary provision site because he did not pay the building deposit or it was unable to properly operate the salary provision site. In addition to the Defendant’s liability of KRW 571,00, KRW 2,480,000 to D, KRW 2,65,00, and KRW 1,656,000 to F, the Defendant was urged to lend money from the bond company, and even if there was no other specific property, it is against the cost of living.