The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant was waiting for the victim’s husband to wait at the victim’s destination, and the Defendant did not intend to find the victim’s husband or to confirm the victim’s house through the nearby guard room even though he was unable to accurately know the victim’s house, and did not intend to find out the victim’s husband or to confirm the victim’s house through the nearby guard room, and it is difficult to easily believe that the taxi driver was knee and kneee in the female guest who was diving with the knee; the time of the occurrence of the instant case was 01:45; and that the victim’s statement on some scarfs that were suffering at the time of the occurrence is not consistent, and thus, the entire statement cannot be said to be credibility. In light of the above, the judgment of the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and finding the facts of this case.

2. 판단 살피건대, 피해자가 추행사실을 자각하고 택시에서 내린 후 운전석쪽으로 가서 피고인을 잡아 끌어내리고 주변에도 소리를 질러 추행사실을 알렸다고는 하지만, 원심 판결 이유 및 원심이 적법하게 채택ㆍ조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 당시 지나가던 아파트 주민은 피해자와 피고인 사이의 분쟁이 추행이 아닌 택시비 때문인 것으로 오인하여 피고인에게 대신 택시비까지 건넨 사실에 비추어, 피고인이 피해자를 따라 내려서 택시비를 달라고 요청한 것으로 보이는 점, 피해자는 눈을 떴을 때 정면에 피고인이 보이지는 않았고 피고인은 운전석에서 조수석쪽으로 몸을 튼 상태였었다고 진술하고 있는데, 몸만 튼 상태에서 어느 쪽 손이든 손을 뻗어 피해자의 치마 속에 손을 넣어 음부를 만지는 등의 추행은 피고인의...