1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendants' appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows, even if both parties consider the arguments complementary to the trial in the first instance, the grounds for the judgment of the first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Defendants asserts that the Defendants’ additional determination is based on the Defendants’ physical punishment that the Plaintiff suffered injury on February 2, 2015 and December 2015. However, the Plaintiff’s failure to undergo medical treatment in 2018, which was around three years thereafter, left the damaged part, and the Plaintiff’s failure to undergo medical intervention and aggravated the state of the injury. As such, the Defendants’ liability should be limited in consideration of such circumstances.

However, the fact that the Plaintiff received medical treatment for physical injury and mental injury caused by the Defendants’ harmful act from January 2016 to May 2018 is the same as recognized earlier. Therefore, the Defendants’ above assertion against this is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder should be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's appeal are dismissed as all are without merit.