A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On September 2, 2012, around September 2, 2012, the Defendant purchased Handphones, at the near the water source station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) purchased 300,000 won for the sales price of the psychotropic drugs Mampamin (hereinafter “popon”); and (b) purchased 0.05 grams from the Defendant after being issued 0.05g of Handphones.

2. On September 2, 2012, around September 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) administered a sponphone in the vicinity of the water source station located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) inserted approximately 0.05g of the sponphone purchased in a single-use injection machine; and (c) made B doncon injection into the Defendant’s arms after dilution with their growth.

3. On September 2012, the Defendant purchased Handphones from the street store located in Suwon-si Line C of Suwon-si on September 2012, the Defendant purchased approximately 2.50,000 won in the name of the purchase price of Handphones from among the convenience stores located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the Defendant purchased approximately 0.21g of Handphones from the DNA telephones located in the nearby area after about 10 minutes.

4. On September 2012, the Defendant, at the time and time set forth in the foregoing paragraph 3, injected approximately 0.05g of philophones purchased, as stated in the foregoing paragraph 3, into a single-use injection machine, dilution with biocom, and caused B to injection into the Defendant’s arms.

5. On September 2012, the Defendant administered a philoon medication, as set forth in the foregoing paragraph 4, and around a few times thereafter, inserted approximately 0.05g of philophones purchased as set out in the foregoing paragraph 3 into a single-use injection machine, dilution with raw water, and had B injection into the Defendant’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning B;

1. The second written statement made by the prosecution against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notification of the results of narcotics appraisal;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crimes, and the control of narcotics;