logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.01.30 2013가합228
청구이의
Text

1. The Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2007Gahap2056 decided Dec. 22, 2008 regarding the defendant's use fee of equipment against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is the former owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "each real estate of this case", and according to the sequence Nos. 1 through 6). D, the defendant's representative director, was a company E (the trade name before the change: F. hereinafter "E") and the defendant, engaged in the business of collecting stone from each real estate of this case.

Plaintiff

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd.”) is the purchaser of each real estate of this case, and Plaintiff B is the actual operator of Plaintiff Co., Ltd., and the husband of G, the representative director of Plaintiff Co., Ltd., and the relationship between D and private.

B. The Defendant and E: (a) around May 198; (b) around 198, E obtained a stone collection permit from the head of Gun having jurisdiction over 198 square meters for 10 square meters, 13,896 square meters in the forest site; (c) during the period from June 1, 198 to May 31, 1998; (d) during which stone collection was conducted, 197 square meters in the forest site; (e) 19 square meters in the area of 31,984 square meters in the area of the forest; and (e) 9 square meters in the area of 15 square meters in the area of 194 square meters in the area of 15,832 square meters in the area of 19; (e) 9 square meters in the area of 20,000 square meters in the area of 19,000 square meters in the area of 19,000 square meters in the area of 19,098 square meters in the area of the forest.

arrow