logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.07.10 2013고정2328
존속상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around 14:00 on June 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) held the rear door of the said vehicle stopped and flicked in the front line for the following reasons: (b) on the street near the human police station in the Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do; (c) and (d) on the ground that D, the Defendant, who is the husband, was flicking the Defendant’s children E in a passenger car, the Defendant placed the victim’s head and flicked while stopping the vehicle in the front line, and flick the victim’s head and flicking the flick, etc. of the victim, who was flicked and flicked on his hand, need to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The victim C’s investigative agency and the victim’s statement and the victim’s medical examination report in this court as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged of the instant case.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court: ① At the time of the occurrence of the instant case, G, a police officer who directly arrested the instant vehicle, was sent to the scene to arrest the victim and E (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”) upon receiving a report of hijacking from the Defendant at the time of the occurrence of the instant case; ② At the time of the occurrence of the instant case, G, a police officer who was a police officer who directly arrested the instant vehicle, stated to the effect that the Defendant and the victim did not exercise physical power and have a big dispute over the instant vehicle; ② at the present court, H, a police officer who arrested the instant vehicle with G, stated to the effect that the Defendant and the victim did not have any big dispute over memory, ③ At the time of the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant was called to the scene of the instant vehicle at the time of arrival, and that the Defendant was called to the scene of the instant vehicle at the time of arrival, and that the latter was called to the scene of the instant vehicle at the time of arrival.

arrow