The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who uses the “C” as an clinic in B, a community site related to dental affairs.

On September 3, 2018, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim’s interview attitude in the Guri-si D Building and the “F dental clinic” operated by the victim E in the second floor.

On September 12:43, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected to the “H dental clinic” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) opened a free bulletin board as “C”, “I”; and (c) opened a training course for 10 years of graduation; and (b) there is a gap for 2 years of childbirth; (c) opened a separate interview, but (d) opened a curriculum at the home, and opened a new curriculum for 000 square meters following the day; (b) opened a new curriculum at the bar, and (c) opened a new curriculum for 00-day-day-day-long-day-long-day-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out.