Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,00,00,00,00 for four months of imprisonment for Defendant B.

However, the defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as the representative director of B in Busan Metropolitan City, A is a person in charge of overall business of the above company, and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of textile manufacturing business.

1. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, from December 5, 2012 to March 16, 2015, the Defendant employed “D”, a Vietnamese, as an employee, who did not have the status of stay that could engage in job-seeking activities at the place of business of a stock company B from March 5, 2015.

In addition, the Defendant employed 11 foreigners from December 5, 2012 to March 16, 2015, who did not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, as described in the separate crime list, as employees, respectively.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant, a representative director of the Defendant, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each statement (Evidence Nos. 9);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation forms, certificates of foreign employment, business registration certificates, certified transcript of corporate register, comprehensive records and inquiry of persons interested in immigration, and written notice of results of

1. Relevant Article of the Immigration Control Act and Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the same Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act (Selection of Imprisonment): Defendant B, each of the following subparagraphs 2, Article 99-3 subparagraph 9, Article 94 subparagraph 9, and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act:

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who suspended execution: The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable condition among the reasons for sentencing following the sentencing) is not provided for the crime of this case, but the number of illegal aliens employed by the Defendants is not weak, and the number of illegal aliens are punished by a fine of five million won each by violating the same type of Immigration Control Act around 2010.