logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2019.02.21 2017가합2267
임금
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University. The Plaintiff was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University on September 1, 2001 and was appointed as C University’s culture and government-level full-time lecturer on October 1, 2005. After being appointed as an assistant professor on March 1, 2010, his position was changed to the tourism-based Korean language department. On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was reappointed as an assistant professor on March 1, 2012 and served until February 28, 2014.

B. The Defendant’s disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and revocation thereof, etc. (i) the Defendant: (a) on the ground that “the Plaintiff was taking a 12-time demonstration from March 2009 to June 2009, by pointing out false facts, such as embezzlement suspicion, etc. of government subsidies, and by pointing out false facts in embezzlement, etc.; and (b) on January 10, 201, he/she was subject to a disciplinary action for three months of suspension from office on June 17, 201 (hereinafter “each of the instant disciplinary action”).

(2) The Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Teachers’ Appeal Committee on each of the instant disciplinary actions, and the Teachers’ Appeal Committee rendered a decision to revoke each of the instant disciplinary actions on January 26, 2011, and the Defendant filed a lawsuit to revoke the decision of the Teachers Appeal Committee (Seoul High Court 2012Nu30174) with the Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap2528, but the said court dismissed the Defendant’s claim, and thereafter the Defendant’s appeal (Seoul High Court 2012Nu30174) and the appeal (Supreme Court 2013Du11147) became final and conclusive, and the Defendant revoked each of the instant disciplinary actions against the Plaintiff on January 9, 2014.

3) Meanwhile, from January 10, 201 to February 28, 2012 due to each of the instant disciplinary actions, the Plaintiff was not given academic and other school affairs to the Plaintiff. (C) The Defendant, from October 2013 to December 2013, set the period subject to examination for reappointment as “from 2009 to 2013, the period subject to examination for reappointment is “from 2009 to 1 semester” and carried out the procedures for examination for reappointment of the Plaintiff on December 27, 2013.

arrow