beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the statement made by the investigative agency and the court below at the court below conforms to the facts charged in this case. When comprehensively considering the victim's awareness that the consent of the business operator was necessary for the change of the place of work and the status of the employer and the employee, the defendant's act can lead to a sufficient fear regardless of whether the victim actually sworn or not.
The judgment of the court below which acquitted the charged facts of this case in full view of the following facts: (a) the victim was the state of sending money to four mother countries; and (b) the settlement of accommodation expenses seems to be merely an argument to receive money from the victim; and (c) the court below erred in the misapprehension of the
2. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts
A. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case on the ground that it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s statement of the harm and injury was beyond the limits permitted by social norms to refer to the settlement and consent of the expenses incurred in employment relationship in the course of concluding the employment contract, even if the Defendant’s statement constitutes a threat of harm and injury, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s statement of the expenses incurred in the course of concluding the employment contract exceeded the limits and permissible by social norms.
B. Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which provides the principle of free evaluation of evidence of the trial court, provides that the probative value of evidence shall be based on the free judgment of the judge is due to the fact that it is suitable for the discovery of substantial truth, and thus, the judge of a fact-finding court who has the exclusive right to the determination of evidence does not have the awareness and examined evidence obtained in the trial procedure in fact-finding.
The probative value of evidence is.